Name: sampling for estimating frankliniella species flower thrips and orius species predators in field experiments
Uploaded: 2019-07-17T14:45:00.000+00:00
Duration: 7 min 13 s
Description: Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Sampling for Estimating Frankliniella Species Flower Thrips and Orius Species Predators in Field Experiments at JoVE.com

Support was provided by Specialty Crop Block Grants from the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Numbers 01856 and 024049. Additional support came from cooperative agreements between the USDA-ARS and the University of Florida Numbers 58-6618-2-096 and 58-6618-4-035. We thank the previous students, postdocs, and collaborators who have contributed in so many ways to our research to understand the factors affecting the population dynamics of flower thrips.

1. Field experiment to determine the effects of UV-reflective mulch, kaolin, and companion plants on flower thrips and their minute pirate bug predator
<ol>
	<li>Establish a field experiment with a split-split-plot treatment arrangement in a randomized complete block experimental design with mulch type as whole plot treatments, kaolin and no kaolin as subplot treatments, and companion plants and no companion plants as sub-subplot treatments (Figure 1A,B)9,14.
	<ol>
		<li>Layout blocks of tomatoes or pepper that are each at least 6 m wide and 72 m long.</li>
		<li>Randomly lay in each block whole plots of black and UV-reflective mulch, with each whole plot consisting of six raised mulch beds at least 36 m long.</li>
		<li>Plant one linear row of tomatoes every 45 cm or two linear rows of peppers every 30 cm into the four inner beds of each whole plot.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Kaolin treatment
	<ol>
		<li>Randomly divide each whole plot into equal subplots of kaolin or no kaolin treatments.</li>
		<li>Apply kaolin once or twice weekly at the rate of 7.0 kg/ha to the tomato or pepper plants in the subplots assigned to receive kaolin treatment.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Companion plants
	<ol>
		<li>Randomly divide each subplot into equal sub-subplots of companion plants or nor companion plant treatments.</li>
		<li>Plant two linear rows of Bidens alba (L.) every 30 cm or one linear row of Helianthus annuus L. every 30 cm into the two outer beds of each sub-subplot treatment with companion plants.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
<img alt="Figure 1" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig01.jpg" /> 
Figure 1: Example experimental field study. 
(A) Randomized complete block design to evaluate the separate and interactive effects of companion plants, mulch, and kaolin effects on flower thrips and minute pirate bugs. (B) Bidens alba (L.) evaluated as a companion plant species with tomato as the crop9. Helianthus annuus L. evaluated as a companion plant species with pepper as the crop14. <a href="https://www-jove-com.bdigitaluss.remotexs.co/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig01large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
2. Flower thrips sampling protocol
<ol>
	<li>Prepare 50 mL sample vials before going to the experimental plots.
	<ol>
		<li>Place a label with the mulch, kaolin, and companion plant treatment, the block number, and the sample date on the outside and inside of each vial.</li>
		<li>Put exactly 30 mL of 70% alcohol in each 50 mL vial.</li>
		<li>Place the vials into a tray.</li>
		<li>Take the trays to the experimental field site.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Sample the flowers for thrips and minute pirate bugs.
	<ol>
		<li>Randomly assign the tomato or pepper plants to be sampled in each sub-subplot.</li>
		<li>Sample between mid-morning and mid-afternoon.</li>
		<li>Take the samples from the upper half of the plant.</li>
		<li>Remove the vial lid. Using a sharp-edged razor or scissors, carefully remove the flower from the plant. Quickly place the flower into the appropriate pre-labeled vial. Push the flower into the alcohol of the vial (Figure 2). Replace the lid.</li>
		<li>Collect 10 flowers per sample. Make sure each vial is tightly sealed, then shake each vial to ensure that the flowers are within the alcohol.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Return the trays with samples to the laboratory for storage. To ensure samples do not deteriorate prior to processing, keep samples cool and dry. Refrigerate, if possible, especially for samples that are not processed quickly.</li>
	<li>Repeat the sampling of each sub-subplot at least weekly during the flowering period of the crop.</li>
</ol>
<img alt="Figure 2" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig02.jpg" /> 
Figure 2: Sample removal technique. 
A sample of 10 tomato flowers being collected from a sub-sub plot in the tomato push-pull experiment9. <a href="https://www-jove-com.bdigitaluss.remotexs.co/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig02large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
3. Sample processing in the laboratory
<ol>
	<li>Extract the thrips and minute pirate bugs from the flowers in each sample.
	<ol>
		<li>Remove the sample from the refrigerator and tray without disturbing the contents.</li>
		<li>Remove the lid of the vial and carefully extract with a pipette any excess alcohol above the flowers.</li>
		<li>Reseal the vial and shake to dislodge the thrips and minute pirate bugs in the flowers.</li>
		<li>Open the vial and pour the contents into a Petri dish. Rinse the inside of the vial with 70% alcohol and pour the contents into the Petri dish. Make sure all thrips and minute pirate bugs in the vial are flushed into the Petri dish.</li>
		<li>Dissect each flower with forceps and rinse with 70% alcohol to ensure that all the thrips and minute pirate bugs have been dislodged. Remove and discard the flower parts from the Petri dish (Figure 3).</li>
		<li>Transfer the Petri dish to the platform of a stereoscope with 40x&#8211;150x magnification.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
<img alt="Figure 3" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig03.jpg" /> 
Figure 3: Extracting thrips and minute pirate bugs from flowers. 
A sample of 10 tomato flowers poured into a Petri dish for processing to determine the number of thrips and minute pirate bugs. <a href="https://www-jove-com.bdigitaluss.remotexs.co/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig03large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<ol start="2">
	<li>Identify and count the flower thrips in samples.
	<ol>
		<li>Identify and count in each grid the number of adult males and females of each flower thrips species and the number of Frankliniella species larvae.</li>
		<li>Identify the adult flower thrips species in Florida based on the setae on the pronotum, head and second antennal segment10,11,12.</li>
		<li>Separate the adults of F. bispinosa from the adults of F. tritici and F. occidentalis by the extra stoutness of the two setae on the anterior dorsal margin of the second antennal segment (Figure 4).</li>
		<li>Separate the adult F. occidentalis from those of F. bispinosa and F. tritici by the near equal lengths of the anterior marginal and anterior angular major setae on the pronotum and by the longer fourth postocular setae on the head (Figure 4).</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
<img alt="Figure 4" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig04.jpg" /> 
Figure 4: Examples of morphological characters to identify thrips. 
(A,B,C) F occidentalis: head (A), arrows indicate postocular setae pair IV; pronotum (B), arrows indicate pair of long anteromarginal setae; distal dorsal setae of antenna segment II (B). (D,E,F,G) . F. bispinosa: head (D); pronotum (E); distal dorsal setae of antenna segment II (F,G), arrow indicates stout setae (F), lateral view of stout setae (G). (H,I,J). F. tritici: head (H); pronotum (I); distal dorsal setae of antenna segment II (J). <a href="https://www-jove-com.bdigitaluss.remotexs.co/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig04large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<ol start="3">
	<li>Identify and count the minute pirate bugs in Florida samples.
	<ol>
		<li>Identify and count in each grid the number of adult O. insidiosus and O. pumilio and the number of nymphal Orius species13,15.</li>
		<li>Identify the adult O. insidiosus by the brown basal antennal segments, by the femora that have dark markings, and by the cuneus that is dark brown.</li>
		<li>Identify the adult O. pumilio by the yellow basal antennal segments, the yellow or straw-colored femora, and by the cuneus with pale straw or light-brown color.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Add the numbers from each grid to determine the total number of adult males and females of each flower thrips species, the number of Frankliniella species larvae, the number of adult minute pirate bug of each species, and the number of minute pirate bug nymphs in the sample.</li>
	<li>Select representative vouchers of flower thrips and minute pirate bug adults from the samples. Label by date, plant host, location, and collector. Curate for long-term preservation.</li>
	<li>Transfer the data from each sample to a spreadsheet that includes the sample date, treatment, and replication.</li>
	<li>Create a data file that contains the data from each sample. Include the experimental location, experimental design, and the amounts and dates of each cultural practice used to establish and maintain the experiment.</li>
	<li>Maintain and manage the datafile with appropriate backup for long-term access.</li>
</ol>

<ol>
	<li>Morse, J. G., Hoddle, M. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Invasion+biology+of+thrips.">Invasion biology of thrips.</a> Annual Review of Entomology. 51, 67-89 (2006).</li><li>Funderburk, J., Stavisky, J., Olson, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Predation+of+Frankliniella+occidentalis+(Thysanoptera:+Thripidae)+in+field+peppers+by+Orius+insidiosus+(Hemiptera:+Anthocoridae).">Predation of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in field peppers by Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae).</a> Environmental Entomology. 29, 376-382 (2000).</li><li>Funderburk, J., Frantz, G., Mellinger, C., Tyler-Julian, K., Srivastava, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Biotic+resistance+limits+the+invasiveness+of+the+western+flower+thrips,+Frankliniella+occidentalis+(Thysanoptera:+Thripidae),+in+Florida.">Biotic resistance limits the invasiveness of the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), in Florida.</a> Insect Science. 23, 175-182 (2016).</li><li>Demirozer, O., Tyler-Julian, K., Funderburk, J., Leppla, N., Reitz, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Frankliniella+occidentalis+(Pergande)+integrated+pest+management+programs+for+fruiting+vegetables+in+Florida.">Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) integrated pest management programs for fruiting vegetables in Florida.</a> Pest Management Science. 68, 1537-1545 (2012).</li><li>Kirk, W. D. J., Terry, L. I. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+spread+of+the+western+flower+thrips+Frankliniella+occidentalis+(Pergande).">The spread of the western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande).</a> Agricultural and Forest Entomology. 5, 301-310 (2003).</li><li>Hansen, E. A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Within-plant+distribution+of+Frankliniella+species+(Thysanoptera:+Thripidae)+and+Orius+insidiosus+(Heteroptera:+Anthocoridae)+in+field+pepper.">Within-plant distribution of Frankliniella species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Orius insidiosus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) in field pepper.</a> Environmental Entomology. 32, 1035-1044 (2003).</li><li>Salguero Navas, V. E., Funderburk, J. E., Mack, T. P., Beshear, R. J., Olson, S. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Aggregation+indices+and+sample+size+curves+for+binomial+sampling+of+flower-inhabiting+Frankliniella+species+(Thysanoptera:+Thripidae)+on+tomato.">Aggregation indices and sample size curves for binomial sampling of flower-inhabiting Frankliniella species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on tomato.</a> Journal of Economic Entomology. 87, 1622-1626 (1994).</li><li>Sutherland, A. M., Parrella, M. P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Accuracy,+precision,+and+economic+efficiency+for+three+methods+of+thrips+(Thysanoptera:+Thripidae)+population+density+assessment.">Accuracy, precision, and economic efficiency for three methods of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) population density assessment.</a> Journal of Economic Entomology. 104, 1323-1328 (2011).</li><li>Tyler-Julian, K., Funderburk, J., Srivastava, M., Olson, S., Adkins, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Evaluation+of+a+push-pull+system+for+the+management+of+Frankliniella+species+(Thysanoptera:+Thripidae)+in+tomato.">Evaluation of a push-pull system for the management of Frankliniella species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in tomato.</a> Insects. 9, 187 (2018).</li><li>Arthurs, S. P., Kok-Yokomi, M. L., Smith, H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Florida+flower+thrips+(suggested+common+name)+Frankliniella+bispinosa+Morgan+(Insecta:+Thysanoptera:+Thripidae).">Florida flower thrips (suggested common name) Frankliniella bispinosa Morgan (Insecta: Thysanoptera: Thripidae).</a> University of Florida, IFAS, EDIS Document EENY639. , (2018).</li><li>Cluever, J. D., Smith, H. A., Funderburk, J. E., Frantz, G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Western+flower+thrips+(Frankliniella+occidentalis+[Pergande).">Western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis [Pergande).</a> University of Florida, IFAS, EDIS Document ENY883. , (2018).</li><li>Sprague, D., Funderburk, J., Lucky, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Flower+thrips,+Frankliniella+tritici+(Fitch).">Flower thrips, Frankliniella tritici (Fitch).</a> University of Florida, IFAS, EDIS Document EENY720. , (2018).</li><li>Herring, J. L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+genus+Orius+of+the+Western+Hemisphere+(Hemiptera:+Anthocoridae).">The genus Orius of the Western Hemisphere (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae).</a> Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 59, 1093-1109 (1966).</li><li>Tyler-Julian, K., Funderburk, J., Frantz, G., Mellinger, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Evaluation+of+a+push-pull+strategy+for+the+management+of+Frankliniella+bispinosa+(Thysanoptera:+Thripidae)+in+bell+pepper.">Evaluation of a push-pull strategy for the management of Frankliniella bispinosa (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in bell pepper.</a> Environmental Entomology. 43, 1364-1378 (2014).</li><li>Shapiro, J. P., Shirk, P. D., Kelley, K., Lewis, T. M., Horton, D. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Identity+of+two+sympatric+species+of+Orius+(Hemiptera:+Heteroptera:+Anthocoridae).">Identity of two sympatric species of Orius (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Anthocoridae).</a> Journal of Insect Science. 10, 189 (2010).</li><li>Salguero Navas, V. E., Funderburk, J. E., Beshear, R. J., Olson, S. M., Mack, T. P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Seasonal+patterns+of+Frankliniella+spp.+(Thysanoptera:+Thripidae)+in+tomato+flowers.">Seasonal patterns of Frankliniella spp. (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in tomato flowers.</a> Journal of Economic Entomology. 84, 1818-1822 (1991).</li><li>Funderburk, C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Population+dynamics+of+Frankliniella+bispinosa+(Thysanoptera:+Thripidae)+and+the+predator+Orius+insidiosus+(Hemiptera:+Anthocoridae)+as+influenced+by+flower+color+of+Lagerstroemia+(Lythraceae).">Population dynamics of Frankliniella bispinosa (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and the predator Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) as influenced by flower color of Lagerstroemia (Lythraceae).</a> Environmental Entomology. 44, 668-679 (2015).</li><li>Ramachandran, S., Funderburk, J. E., Stavisky, J., Olson, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Population+abundance+and+movement+of+Frankiliniella+thrips+and+Orius+insidiosus+in+field+pepper.">Population abundance and movement of Frankiliniella thrips and Orius insidiosus in field pepper.</a> Agricultural and Forest Entomology. 3, 129-137 (2001).</li><li>Baez, I., Reitz, S., Funderburk, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Predation+by+Orius+insidiosus+(Heteroptera:+Anthocoridae)+on+life+stages+and+species+of+Frankliniella+flower+thrips+(Thysanoptera:+Thripidae)+in+pepper+flowers.">Predation by Orius insidiosus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) on life stages and species of Frankliniella flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in pepper flowers.</a> Environmental Entomology. 33, 662-670 (2004).</li><li>Nakahara, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Annotated+list+of+the+Frankliniella+species+of+the+world+(Thysanoptera:+Thripidae).">Annotated list of the Frankliniella species of the world (Thysanoptera: Thripidae).</a> Contributions on Entomology, International. 2, 355-389 (1997).</li></ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Sampling protocols with desired levels of precision to estimate population densities of flower thrips were developed for Florida crops over more than three decades of field research. Studies were conducted to understand important aspects of flower thrips biology that affect population estimates. For example, studies were conducted to understand the effects on estimates of time of day when sampling16, sample location within the field16, sample location on individual plants6,16, patterns of aggregation in flowers7, and flower color17. These factors were found to influence population estimates; so, the decisions of where, when, and how are critically important when designing the sampling protocol in future research studies.
Minute pirate bug adults and nymphs are highly anthophilous, and the predator aggregates with its prey in a density-dependent manner by preferring the same flowers also preferred by the thrips17. They also exploit cues from prey or from plants damaged by prey in locating thrips. The adults move rapidly between flowers, a behavior that enhances their ability to track local populations of thrips prey in space and time18. Therefore, sampling protocols developed for estimating populations of thrips should be used in future studies when estimating populations of minute pirate bugs. Minute pirate bugs are efficient predators of the adults and larvae of different Frankliniella species flower thrips19. The number of the predator relative to the number of total thrips prey provides the best estimate of the ability of the minute pirate bugs to suppress and control mixed populations of thrips in the flowers. This should be considered when analyzing the data in future studies.
The Frankliniella species adults rapidly colonize host crops once flowering begins, and rapid population growth follows in the absence of mortality from natural enemies2,18,19. On a good plant host for both predator and thrips prey such as sunflower, numbers of thrips are greatest soon after flower initiation, followed by declines in populations as minute pirate bugs increase (Figure 9). Populations of minute pirate bugs remain even though thrips are nearly extinct. To fully understand this predator-prey dynamic relationship, it is necessary to sample frequently throughout the flowering period of the crop. The same is true when investigating the efficacy of other types of tactics, as they may be efficacious on some dates and not others. Once or twice weekly sampling over the entire period of flowering was employed to evaluate the effects of multiple tactics in the push-pull system under investigation in Tyler-Julian et al.9,14.
Frankliniella is the second largest genus in the family Thripidae, and there is a large amount of literature describing the adult life stages20. A complex of species inhabits flowers that is specific to different plant host species and geographic locations. Therefore, expert identification of slide-prepared specimens from a subset of the initial samplings is critical. Then, in any given plant host and geographic location, taxonomic characters unique to the adults of each species can be chosen so that the species can be determined in future studies without going to the laborious and costly procedure of placing each onto microscope slides for viewing under a compound microscope. They simply can be viewed and identified under a stereoscope. (In some unusual situations, the morphological characters separating two species are so similar that they cannot be separated under the stereoscope.) Methods described here for the flower thrips species common in most crops in Florida should be adapted and used at other geographic locations when processing the large numbers of samples needed in field studies to determine the efficacy of management tactics and to evaluate the benefits of predation by minute pirate bugs.

The western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), was one of the first great pests that was spread worldwide as a result of globalism and the international trade of agricultural products. Economic damage results directly from feeding and oviposition and indirectly through transmission of plant pathogenic viruses. Invasive populations were already largely resistant to most classes of insecticides, and the attempts to control populations with insecticides has only increased damage by eliminating important natural enemies and competitor species. This control approach has destabilized management programs and has resulted in resistant pest populations, secondary pest outbreaks, and environmental degradation1.
Integrated pest management programs have been developed from knowledge of pest and natural enemy relationships and the effects of management tactics on these relationships. The population characteristics of rapid colonization and growth have been long believed to outstrip the capacities of natural enemies to regulate the opportunistic western flower thrips; that is, until it was shown that predation from natural populations of Orius insidiosus (Say) not only resulted in suppression of western flower thrips populations but also a decline of populations toward extinction2. Furthermore, the western flower thrips is mostly flower-inhabiting, in which it competes for pollen and other flower resources with native polyphagous flower thrips.
In most of the eastern United States, the main native competitor is Frankliniella tritici (Fitch), while in southern Florida the main competitor species is Frankliniella bispinosa (Morgan)3. The western flower thrips suffers strong biotic resistance in Florida from the native species of predators and competitor flower thrips species; however, it is the dominant species in habitats disturbed by insecticides and other tactics that exclude competitor thrips and natural enemies. Therefore, a core component of successful integrated pest management programs for fruiting vegetables is increased predation and competition3,4. These programs have been developed from knowledge of predator-prey dynamics and the effectiveness of various tactics to manage thrips and increase biotic resistance. Here, the methodology used to estimate the densities of individual thrips and minute pirate bug species in the flowers of fruiting vegetables and companion plants in Florida are shown. The data are used to determine the efficacy of management tactics and evaluate the benefits of predation by minute pirate bugs.
Designing the flower thrips sampling protocol: background information
When the western flower thrips emerged as a major pest in the 1980s5, it was necessary to develop procedures to accurately, efficiently, and precisely determine the number of individual thrips species in field studies. The procedures described here have been developed from knowledge gained in numerous studies conducted to understand the biology and management of flower thrips. Examples of these studies include work by Funderburk et al.2, Hansen et al.6, Salguero Navas et al.7, Sutherland et al.8, and Tyler-Julian et al.9. The concentrations of Frankliniella species and minute pirate bugs in flowers is behaviorally based and not an artifact of insecticide applications or sampling6. Estimates of populations in flowers over other plant parts usually is sufficient for understanding the local dynamics of predator and prey on a plant host and evaluating the benefits of biological control programs based on the predator to prey ratios. However, the methodology developed for flowers can be adapted to the sampling of other plant parts. The usual sample unit is one or more flowers. The number of samples needed to achieve the desired level of precision is a function of population density and number of flowers in the sample unit.
Species of Frankliniella tend to be an aggregated distribution in flowers, and populations usually are concentrated in the flowers of the upper plant canopy7. For most studies, flowers are randomly selected from the upper half of the plant. Relative techniques to remove thrips from flowers, including liquid washing, mechanical dislodgement, or desiccation, are inaccurate and imprecise8. For this reason, a direct counting, absolute estimate technique is used. Thrips are small organisms about 2 mm in Iength, and microscopy usually is necessary to accurately determine the species. The flowers constituting a sample unit are placed in a vial of 70% alcohol. Once the samples are collected, the vials from each plot are returned to the laboratory for extraction of the thrips and minute pirate bugs and accurate determination of the sex, species, and stage of each. Experiments consist of replicated field plots that are used to evaluate the efficacy of treatments to suppress thrips and the benefits of predation by minute pirate bugs. Flower samples are taken at least weekly during the flowering period of the plant host. Randomized complete block experimental designs are useful in removing from the experimental error differences in thrips and minute pirate bug densities between blocks. Sub-plot treatment arrangements are useful to reduce inter-plot effects of management tactics that affect thrips movement9.
Flower sample processing and analysis: background information
Prior to the 1990s, keys to species of thrips were developed for use by taxonomic specialists, who placed thrips for identification onto microscope slides using one of several mounting media. Researchers studying thrips biology and management were not taxonomic specialists, and there was no involvement by taxonomic specialists in the studies. Typically, the thrips in samples from these studies were lumped into the genus, family, suborder, or order levels of classification. After the spread of the western flower thrips, there was 1) rapid proliferation of research concerning thrips biology and management and 2) recognition by researchers for the need to identify thrips species and develop an efficient system for processing samples.
In studies in the mid-1990s involving thrips population biology, adult thrips from the samples were placed onto microscope slides and identified to species by taxonomic specialist R. J. Beshear (e.g., Salguero Navas et al.7). The larvae were only identified to genus due to a lack of larval identification keys available at that time. The slide mounting was costly and laborious, and a more efficient system was developed2. In subsequent studies, the thrips in the samples were extracted from the flowers in a Petri dish containing 70% alcohol, and the males and females in the Petri dish were identified to species under stereoscopy. Most of our research involves species of Frankliniella. The adults of these species were separated to species under the stereoscope using differences in their chaetotaxy on the dorsal surface of the pronotum, head, and antennae10,11,12.
Additional expertise in thrips taxonomy has been acquired to recognize and identify other thrips genera and species in the samples. There are numerous Orius species worldwide that are important predators of thrips. Two species, O. insidiosus and O. pumilio (Champion), are sympatric throughout much of Florida13. The adults of these species are separated by color characteristics of the basal antennal segment, femora of the hind leg, and cuneus on the wing. Thrips species and genders differ in their biology and behavior; therefore, data for each are typically separately analyzed. Because the thrips populations in flowers have an aggregated pattern of distribution, the data needs transformation to stabilize variances between treatments. Treatment means are compared using analysis of variance as appropriate for the experimental design, and the data is analyzed for each individual date and/or for data pooled over date2,9. The analysis of effects on individual dates is important when treatment differences vary over date. The ratio of the total thrips (adults and larvae) per minute pirate bug (adults and nymphs) is used to evaluate the effectiveness of biological control with minute pirate bugs in Florida field studies suppressing thrips populations at a ratio of about one predator for every 180 thrips2,9.

<table><tbody><tr><td>Alcohol</td><td>Any source</td><td></td><td>70% ethanol or isopropyl</td></tr><tr><td>Centrifuge tube</td><td>Fisher Scientific Co.</td><td>06-443-18</td><td>Flat cap and trayed</td></tr><tr><td>Forceps</td><td>Fisher Scientific Co.</td><td>08-885</td><td>Medium point</td></tr><tr><td>Kaolin clay</td><td>Novasource</td><td>Surround WP</td><td>95% kaolin</td></tr><tr><td>Pasteur pipet</td><td>Fisher Scientific Co.</td><td>13-678-6A</td><td>5 &amp;frac34; inch disposable</td></tr><tr><td>Petri dish</td><td>Fisher Scientific Co.</td><td>FB0875711A</td><td>With grid</td></tr><tr><td>Probes/seekers</td><td>Fisher Scientific Co.</td><td>08-995</td><td>6 inch bent end</td></tr><tr><td>Scalpel</td><td>Fisher Scientific Co.</td><td>14-840-00</td><td>Excel international</td></tr><tr><td>Stereomicroscope</td><td>Leica Microsystems</td><td>M Series</td><td>40X and greater</td></tr><tr><td>UV-reflective mulch</td><td>Intergro</td><td>Metalized</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

sampling for estimating frankliniella species flower thrips and orius species predators in field experiments

The western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), is a polyphagous pest that has been spread worldwide. The extensive use of insecticides in attempts to control its populations eliminates natural enemies and competitor flower thrips species, thereby increasing its populations. An unsustainable situation develops with concomitant resistant pest populations, secondary pest outbreaks, and environmental degradation. Integrated pest management utilizes knowledge of pest and natural enemy relationships to implement tactics that are environmentally friendly and sustainable. Minute pirate bugs are the most important worldwide predators of thrips. They can suppress and ultimately control Frankliniella species flower thrips. Flower samples taken at least weekly are needed to understand predator-prey dynamics. Shown here is the sampling of the flowers of fruiting vegetables and companion plants to estimate the densities of individual thrips and minute pirate bug species. Representative data illustrates how the protocol is used to determine the efficacy of management tactics over time and how to evaluate the benefits of predation by minute pirate bugs. The sampling protocol is similarly adaptable to sampling thrips and minute pirate bugs in other plant species hosts.

Data collected in the study by Tyler-Julian et al.9 can be used to demonstrate the separate and combined effects of push factors (i.e., ultraviolet-reflective mulch and kaolin application) and pull factor (i.e., the companion plant Spanish needle, B. alba) on the population dynamics of F. occidentalis adult males and females in tomato flowers (Figure 1A). The agricultural plastic mulch treatments in the experiment were used to form the bed of the raised-bed plastic mulch system that is typical of the production system used to grow high-value vegetables in Florida. The mechanism of the ultraviolet-reflective mulch in pest control is a visual deterrence that disrupts host-finding by the adult thrips. Kaolin application on the tomato plants also reflects enough ultraviolet light to deter the thrips adults. Therefore, a split-split plot randomized complete block design was employed in the experiment to reduce the inter-plot interference on thrips movement resulting from the ultraviolet-reflecting properties of the mulch and kaolin treatments, with mulch treatment (ultraviolet-reflective vs. conventional black mulch) as the whole plot, kaolin treatment (twice weekly kaolin application vs. no kaolin) as the sub-plot, and companion plant treatment (companion plants vs. no companion) as the sub-subplot. Sub-subplot size was six beds by 9 m, with the four inner beds of each sub-subplot consisting of one linear row of tomato with a 45 cm spacing between plants, for a total of 80 plants per sub-subplot. Two rows of Spanish needle were planted into each of the two external beds in the sub-subplots with the companion plant with a 30 cm spacing within and between rows for a total of 128 companion plants per sub-subplot.
Two samples of 10 tomato flowers were collected in each sub-subplot on each of 13 dates in 2011 during the flowering period of the tomato crop, and the number of adult male and female F. occidentalis in each sample were determined (Figure 5). The effects of mulch, kaolin, and companion plant on each gender were analyzed using analysis of variance for a randomized complete block design for a split-split plot treatment arrangement for data across sample date using a mixed model (see Tyler-Julian et al.9 for a complete description of the analysis of variance and results). The main effects of mulch, kaolin, and companion plant were significant for the male western flower thrips (p &#60; 0.01, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively), while the interactive effects of mulch X kaolin, mulch X companion plant, kaolin X companion plant, and mulch X kaolin X companion plant interactions were not significant (p &#62; 0.05). These results showed that each of the main effects reduced the number of adult male F. occidentalis, and that the effects of each tactic were additive when combined with one another.
The main effect of mulch was significant for the female F. occidentalis (p &#60; 0.01), while the main effects of kaolin and companion plants were not significant for the female F. occidentalis (p &#62; 0.05). Therefore, the ultraviolet-reflective mulch reduced the female F. occidentalis in the tomato flowers, but kaolin and the companion plant did not. However, the mulch X kaolin interaction was significant (p &#60; 0.05) showing that the combined effects of ultraviolet-reflective mulch and kaolin reduced the female F. occidentalis more than either tactic alone, while the kaolin applied to tomato on black mulch did not reduce female F. occidentalis numbers. The interactive effects of mulch X companion plant, kaolin X companion plant, and mulch X kaolin X companion plant interactions for female F. occidentalis were not significant (p &#62; 0.05).
<img alt="Figure 5" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig05.jpg" /> 
Figure 5: Example of analysis of data over sample date. 
The mean number per 10 tomato flowers (SEM) of adult male and female F. occidentalis in mulch, kaolin, and companion plant treatments for sample data pooled across 13 dates in 2011 in a push-pull experiment conducted in Gadsden County, Florida. This figure has been modified from Tyler-Julian et al.9
The interaction of mulch X sample date was significant in the experiment in 2011 for male and female F. occidentalis adults (p &#60; 0.01 and 0.001, respectively)9. This revealed that the ultraviolet-reflective mulch reduced flower thrips numbers on some, but not all, sample dates. Therefore, additional analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of mulch on individual sample dates. The interaction showed that the ultraviolet-reflective mulch was effective in reducing flower thrips numbers early in the season, but there was no significance on individual sample dates during mid- or late-season (Figure 6).
<img alt="Figure 6" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig06.jpg" /> 
Figure 6: Example of population dynamics for whole plot treatment. 
The mean number (+SEM) per 10 tomato flowers (n = 18 samples) of adult male and female F. occidentalis on each 2011 sample date in the whole plot treatment of black and ultraviolet-reflective mulch for data pooled across kaolin and companion plant treatments in the push-pull experiments conducted in Gadsden County, Florida (*indicates significance beyond 95% level of significance according to analysis of variance conducted for individual sample dates; d.f. = 1, 2). This figure has been modified from Tyler-Julian et al.9. <a href="https://www-jove-com.bdigitaluss.remotexs.co/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig06large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
The interaction of kaolin X sample date was not significant in 2011 for male or female F. occidentalis (p &#62; 0.05)9. As previously shown above, the analyses of data pooled over sample date revealed that kaolin did not significantly affect female F. occidentalis numbers, while male F. occidentalis numbers were significantly reduced. The lack of a significant kaolin X sample date interaction in the analyses for data pooled over sample date suggested that the results for each gender were consistent across sample date (Figure 7).
<img alt="Figure 7" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig07.jpg" /> 
Figure 7: Example of population dynamics for subplot treatment. 
The mean number (+SEM) per 10 tomato flowers (n = 12 samples) of adult male and female F. occidentalis on each 2011 sample date in the subplot treatment of kaolin and no kaolin for data pooled across companion plant treatments in the push-pull experiments conducted in Gadsden County, Florida (*indicates significance beyond 95% level of significance according to analysis of variance conducted for individual sample dates; d.f. = 1, 4). This figure has been modified from Tyler-Julian et al.9. <a href="https://www-jove-com.bdigitaluss.remotexs.co/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig07large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
The interaction of companion plant X sample date was significant in 2011 for male F. occidentalis (p &#60; 0.05), but not for female F. occidentalis (p &#62; 0.05)9. The analyses conducted to evaluate the effects of companion plant on individual sample dates revealed that companion plants reduced adult F. occidentalis numbers on late season sample dates, but never on early or mid-season sample dates (Figure 8).
<img alt="Figure 8" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig08.jpg" /> 
Figure 8: Example of population dynamics for sub-subplot treatment. 
The mean number (+SEM) per 10 tomato flowers (n = 6 samples) of adult male and female F. occidentalis on each 2011 sample date in the sub-subplot treatment of companion plant and no companion plant in the push-pull experiments conducted in Gadsden County, Florida (*indicates significance beyond 95% level of significance according to analysis of variance conducted for individual sample dates; d.f. = 1, 8). This&#160;figure has been modified from Tyler-Julian et al.9. <a href="https://www-jove-com.bdigitaluss.remotexs.co/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig08large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
Data collected from the flowers of the companion plant in the study of Tyler-Julian et al.14 can be used to demonstrate the dynamic relationship between minute pirate bugs and its thrips prey in flowers (Figure 1B). As in the Tyler-Julian et al.9 study, the objectives were to determine the separate and combined effects of push factors (i.e., ultraviolet-reflective mulch and kaolin application) and a pull factor (i.e., the companion plant), on the population dynamics of Frankliniella species adult males and females in crop flowers. In the Tyler-Julian et al.14 study, the predominant flower thrips species was F. bispinosa in the companion plant H. annuus and in the pepper crop (&#62;99% of the total thrips in the flowers). The thrips rapidly colonized the sunflowers and the pepper flowers, and their numbers were greatest soon after flowering began (Figure 9). Populations of thrips declined over time as the numbers of minute pirate bugs increased. The predator-prey ratio illustrated the ability of the predator to suppress the thrips populations with near extinction of the thrips populations occurring at ratios of &#62;1 predator per 40 thrips.
<img alt="Figure 9" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/59869/59869fig09.jpg" /> 
Figure 9: Example of evaluating the benefits of predation. 
Mean number (+SEM) of total thrips (adults and larvae) and total Orius spp. (adults and nymphs) per Helianthus annuus flower head in experiments conducted in 2011 and 2012 in Palm Beach County, Florida (the number of total thrips prey per predator on each date shown in parenthesis). This figure has been adapted from data reported in Tyler-Julian et al.14 with permission from Oxford University Press.

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Sampling for Estimating Frankliniella Species Flower Thrips and Orius Species Predators in Field Experiments at JoVE.com

Sampling for Estimating Frankliniella Species Flower Thrips and Orius Species Predators in Field Experiments

Presented here is a protocol to determine the number of thrips and minute pirate bug predators in crops over multiple dates in field experiments. Also illustrated is how to determine the efficacy of management tactics against thrips and evaluate the benefits of predation by minute pirate bugs.

Sampling for Estimating Frankliniella Species Flower Thrips and Orius Species Predators in Field Experiments

The western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), is a polyphagous pest that has been spread worldwide. The extensive use of insecticides ...

sampling-for-estimating-frankliniella-species-flower-thrips-orius

Universidad San Sebastian

Research

JoVE Journal

Environment

8.8K Views.  University of Florida. Presented here is a protocol to determine the number of thrips and minute pirate bug predators in crops over multiple dates in field experiments. Also illustrated is how to determine the efficacy of management tactics against thrips and evaluate the benefits of predation by minute pirate bugs.

Video: Sampling for Estimating Frankliniella Species Flower Thrips and Orius Species Predators in Field Experiments

Application of Two-spotted Spider Mite Tetranychus urticae for Plant-pest Interaction Studies

The two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, is a ubiquitous polyphagous arthropod herbivore that feeds on a remarkably broad array of species, with more than 150 of economic value. It is a major pest of greenhouse crops, especially in Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae (e.g., tomatoes, eggplants, peppers, cucumbers, zucchini) and greenhouse ornamentals (e.g., roses, chrysanthemum, carnations), annual field crops (such as maize, cotton, soybean, and sugar beet), and in perennial cultures (alfalfa, strawberries, grapes, citruses, and plums)1,2. In addition to the extreme polyphagy that makes it an important agricultural pest, T. urticae has a tendency to develop resistance to a wide array of insecticides and acaricides that are used for its control3-7.
T. urticae is an excellent experimental organism, as it has a rapid life cycle (7 days at 27 &#176;C) and can be easily maintained at high density in the laboratory. Methods to assay gene expression (including in situ hybridization and antibody staining) and to inactivate expression of spider mite endogenous genes using RNA interference have been developed8-10. Recently, the whole genome sequence of T. urticae has been reported, creating an opportunity to develop this pest herbivore as a model organism with equivalent genomic resources that already exist in some of its host plants (Arabidopsis thaliana and the&#160;tomato Solanum lycopersicum)11. Together, these&#160;model organisms could provide insights into molecular bases of plant-pest interactions.
Here, an efficient method for quick and easy collection of a large number of adult female mites, their application on an experimental plant host, and the assessment of the plant damage due to spider mite feeding are described. The presented protocol enables fast and efficient collection of hundreds of individuals at any developmental stage (eggs, larvae, nymphs, adult males, and females) that can be used for subsequent experimental application.

Application of Two-spotted Spider Mite Tetranychus urticae for Plant-pest Interaction Studies

Protocols for efficient preparation of homogenous samples of spider mites, infestation of experimental plants, and assessment of plant damage, as required for studies of plant-pest interaction were developed.

The two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, is a ubiquitous polyphagous arthropod herbivore that feeds on a remarkably broad array of species, with ...

Administering and Detecting Protein Marks on Arthropods for Dispersal Research

Monitoring arthropod movement is often required to better understand associated population dynamics, dispersal patterns, host plant preferences, and other ecological interactions. Arthropods are usually tracked in nature by tagging them with a unique mark and then re-collecting them over time and space to determine their dispersal capabilities. In addition to actual physical tags, such as colored dust or paint, various types of proteins have proven very effective for marking arthropods for ecological research. Proteins can be administered internally and/or externally. The proteins can then be detected on recaptured arthropods with a protein-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Here we describe protocols for externally and internally tagging arthropods with protein. Two simple experimental examples are demonstrated: (1) an internal protein mark introduced to an insect by providing a protein-enriched diet and (2) an external protein mark topically applied to an insect using a medical nebulizer. We then relate a step-by-step guide of the sandwich and indirect ELISA methods used to detect protein marks on the insects. In this demonstration, various aspects of the acquisition and detection of protein markers on arthropods for mark-release-recapture, mark-capture, and self-mark-capture types of research are discussed, along with the various ways that the immunomarking procedure has been adapted to suit a wide variety of research objectives.

Proteins are often used to mark arthropods for dispersal research. Methods for administering internal and external protein marks on arthropods are demonstrated. Protein mark detection techniques, either through indirect or sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), are also illustrated.

Monitoring arthropod movement is often required to better understand associated population dynamics, dispersal patterns, host plant preferences, and other ...

Field Experiments of Pollination Ecology: The Case of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea

Plant-pollinator interactions have been studied for approximately one hundred years. During that time, many field methods have been developed to clarify the pollination effectiveness of each pollinator for visited flowers. Pollinator observations have been one of the most common methods to identify pollinators, and bagging and cage experiments have been conducted to show the effectiveness of specific pollinators. In a previous study of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea, its effective pollinators, the visitation frequencies of each floral visitor, and its reproductive strategies were not identified. This study reports the observation that small bees visited flowers that were partially opened (breaking buds). To the best of our knowledge, this phenomenon has not been reported previously. Further, this study investigates the hypothesis that small bees can pollinate at that flowering stage. This study demonstrates the basic methods of field experiments in pollination ecology using L. sanguinea var. sanguinea. Pollinator observations and digital video showed the visitation frequencies of each floral visitor. Bagging and cage experiments revealed that these flowers could be pollinated fully and that breaking-bud pollination could be important for the pollination of this plant species. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed, and recent developments, including laboratory experiments, are described.

Field Experiments of Pollination Ecology: The Case of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea

To reveal the pollinator effectiveness of a given plant species, multiple methods of field experiments have been developed. This study demonstrates the basic methods of field experiments for pollination ecology using the case study of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea and the novel pollination mechanism, breaking-bud pollination.

Plant-pollinator interactions have been studied for approximately one hundred years. During that time, many field methods have been developed to clarify ...

Methodology for Developing Life Tables for Sessile Insects in the Field Using the Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in Cotton As a Model System

Life tables provide a means of measuring the schedules of birth and death from populations over time. They also can be used to quantify the sources and rates of mortality in populations, which has a variety of applications in ecology, including agricultural ecosystems. Horizontal, or cohort-based, life tables provide for the most direct and accurate method of quantifying vital population rates because they follow a group of individuals in a population from birth to death. Here, protocols are presented for conducting and analyzing cohort-based life tables in the field that takes advantage of the sessile nature of the immature life stages of a global insect pest, Bemisia tabaci. Individual insects are located on the underside of cotton leaves and are marked by drawing a small circle around the insect with a non-toxic pen. This insect can then be observed repeatedly over time with the aid of hand lenses to measure development from one stage to the next and to identify stage-specific causes of death associated with natural and introduced mortality forces. Analyses explain how to correctly measure multiple mortality forces that act contemporaneously within each stage and how to use such data to provide meaningful population dynamic metrics. The method does not directly account for adult survival and reproduction, which limits inference to dynamics of immature stages. An example is presented that focused on measuring the impact of bottom-up (plant quality) and top-down (natural enemies) effects on the mortality dynamics of B. tabaci in the cotton system.

Methodology for Developing Life Tables for Sessile Insects in the Field Using the Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in Cotton As a Model System

Life tables allow quantification of the sources and rates of mortality in insect populations and contribute to understanding, predicting and manipulating population dynamics in agroecosystems. Methods for conducting and analyzing cohort-based life tables in the field for an insect with sessile immature life stages are presented.

Life tables provide a means of measuring the schedules of birth and death from populations over time. They also can be used to quantify the sources and ...

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

Terrestrial arthropods play an important role in our environment. Quantifying arthropods in a way that allows for a precise index or estimates of density requires a method with high detection probability and a known sampling area. While most described methods provide a qualitative or semi-quantitative estimate adequate for describing species presence, richness, and diversity, few provide an adequately consistent detection probability and known or consistent sampling areas to provide an index or estimate with adequate precision to detect differences in abundance across environmental, spatial, or temporal variables. We describe how to quantify leaf-dwelling arthropods by sealing the leaves and end of branches in a bag, clipping and freezing the bagged material, and rinsing the previously frozen material in water to separate arthropods from the substrate and quantify them. As we demonstrate, this method can be used at a landscape scale to quantify leaf-dwelling arthropods with adequate precision to test for and describe how spatial, temporal, environmental, and ecological variables influence arthropod richness and abundance. This method allowed us to detect differences in density, richness, and diversity of leaf-dwelling arthropods among 5 genera of trees commonly found in southeastern deciduous forests.

We describe how to quantify leaf dwelling arthropods by sealing the leaves and end of branches in a bag, clipping and freezing the bagged material, and rinsing the previously frozen material in water to separate arthropods from the substrate for quantification.

Terrestrial arthropods play an important role in our environment. Quantifying arthropods in a way that allows for a precise index or estimates of density ...

Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps

Terrestrial arthropods play an important role in our environment. Quantifying arthropods in a way that allows for a precise index or estimate of density requires a method with high detection probability and a consistent sampling area. We used manufactured sticky traps to compare abundance, total length (a surrogate for biomass), richness, and Shannon diversity of corticolous arthropods among the boles of 5 tree species. Efficacy of this method was adequate to detect variation in corticolous arthropods among tree species and provide a standard error of the mean that was &#60;20% of the mean for all estimates with sample sizes from 7 to 15 individual trees of each species. Our results indicate, even with these moderate sample sizes, the level of precision of arthropod community metrics produced with this approach is adequate to address most ecological questions regarding temporal and spatial variation in corticolous arthropods. Results from this method differ from other quantitative approaches such as chemical knockdown, visual inspection, and funnel traps in that they provide an indication of corticolous arthropod activity over a relatively long-term, better including temporary bole residents, flying arthropods that temporarily land on the tree bole and crawling arthropods that use the tree bole as a travel route from the ground to higher forest foliage. Furthermore, we believe that commercially manufactured sticky traps provide more precise estimates and are logistically simpler than the previously described method of directly applying a sticky material to tree bark or applying a sticky material to tape or other type of backing and applying that to the tree bark.

We describe a semi-quantitative approach of measuring characteristics of corticolous (bark-dwelling) arthropod communities. We placed commercially manufactured sticky traps on tree boles to estimate abundance, total length (a surrogate to biomass), richness, and Shannon diversity for comparison among tree species.

Terrestrial arthropods play an important role in our environment. Quantifying arthropods in a way that allows for a precise index or estimate of density ...

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

An inexpensive, noninvasive system that could accurately classify flying insects would have important implications for entomological research, and allow for the development of many useful applications in vector and pest control for both medical and agricultural entomology. Given this, the last sixty years have seen many research efforts devoted to this task. To date, however, none of this research has had a lasting impact. In this work, we show that pseudo-acoustic optical sensors can produce superior data; that additional features, both intrinsic and extrinsic to the insect&#8217;s flight behavior, can be exploited to improve insect classification; that a Bayesian classification approach allows to efficiently learn classification models that are very robust to over-fitting, and a general classification framework allows to easily incorporate arbitrary number of features. We demonstrate the findings with large-scale experiments that dwarf all previous works combined, as measured by the number of insects and the number of species considered.

We proposed a system that uses inexpensive, noninvasive pseudo-acoustic optical sensors to automatically and accurately detect, count, and classify flying insects based on their flying sound.

An inexpensive, noninvasive system that could accurately classify flying insects would have important implications for entomological research, and allow ...

Bioengineering

Topical Application Bioassay to Quantify Insecticide Toxicity for Mosquitoes and Fruit Flies

The continued use of insecticides for public health and agriculture has led to widespread insecticide resistance and hampering of control methods. Insecticide resistance surveillance of mosquito populations is typically done through Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) bottle bioassays or World Health Organization (WHO) tube tests. However, these methods can result in a high degree of variability in mortality data due to variable insecticide contact with&#160;the insect, the relatively small numbers of organisms tested, extensive variation in mass between populations, and constantly changing environmental conditions, leading to variable outcomes. This paper presents the topical application bioassay, adapted as a high-throughput phenotypic bioassay for both mosquitoes and fruit flies, to test large numbers of insects along&#160;a range of insecticide concentrations.
This assay 1) ensures consistent treatment and insecticide contact with every organism, 2) produces highly specific dose-response curves that account for differences in average mass between strains and sexes (which is particularly important for field-collected organisms), and 3) allows for the calculation of statistically rigorous median lethal doses (LD50), which are necessary for resistance ratio comparisons-an alternative surveillance approach from diagnostic dose mortality, which is also used for larvicide resistance surveillance. This assay will be a complementary tool for accurately phenotyping mosquito populations and, as illustrated using fruit flies, is easily adaptable for use with other insects. We argue that this assay will help fill the gap between genotypic and phenotypic insecticide resistance in multiple insect species.

We describe the methodology and importance of the topical application bioassay to measure insecticide susceptibility in mosquitoes and fruit flies. The presented assay is high-throughput, utilizes insect mass-thus allowing for calculating a mass-relativized lethal dose instead of concentration-and likely has lower variability than other similar methods.

The continued use of insecticides for public health and agriculture has led to widespread insecticide resistance and hampering of control methods. ...

Biology

The Mushing, Sieving, and Floating Method for Detecting Fruit Fly Larvae

Sieving Fruit Pulp to Detect Immature Tephritid Fruit Flies in the Field

Fruit flies of the Tephritidae family are among the most destructive and invasive agricultural pests in the world. Many countries undertake expensive eradication programs to eliminate incipient populations. During eradication programs, a concerted effort is made to detect larvae, as this strongly indicates a breeding population and helps establish the spatial extent of the infestation. The detection of immature life stages triggers additional control and regulatory actions to contain and prevent any further spread of the pest. Traditionally, larval detection is accomplished by cutting individual host fruits and examining them visually. This method is labor intensive, as only a limited number of fruit can be processed, and the probability of missing a larva is high. An extraction technique that combines i) mushing host fruit in a plastic bag, ii) straining pulp through a series of sieves, iii) placing retained pulp in a brown sugar water solution, and iv) collecting larvae that float to the surface was tested. The method was evaluated in Florida with field-collected guava naturally infested by Anastrepha suspensa. To mimic low populations more representative of a fruit fly eradication program, mangos and papaya in Hawaii were infested with a known, low number of Bactrocera dorsalis larvae. The applicability of the method was tested in the field on guava naturally infested by B. dorsalis to evaluate the method under conditions experienced by workers during an emergency fruit fly program. In both field and laboratory trials, mushing and sieving the pulp was more efficient (required less time) and more sensitive (more larvae found) than cutting fruit. Floating the pulp in brown sugar water solution helped detect earlier instar larvae. Mushing and sieving fruit pulp of important tephritid hosts may increase the probability of detecting larvae during emergency programs.

Author Spotlight: Sieving Fruit Pulp to Detect Immature Tephritid Fruit Flies in the Field  

Increasing the detection of immature tephritid fruit flies in the field can trigger timely efforts to eliminate populations of these destructive pests. Detecting late instar larvae is faster and more accurate when mushing host fruit in a bag and passing the pulp through a series of sieves than hand cutting and visual inspection.

Fruit flies of the Tephritidae family are among the most destructive and invasive agricultural pests in the world. Many countries undertake expensive ...

Cost-Effective Method for Safely Handling and Sampling Field-Collected Bees

A Rapid Method to Confine and Safely Handle Bees in the Field

Improving understanding of the basic biology and ecology of many insect pollinators, particularly specialist or rare taxa, is a priority for many researchers. As such, there is often a need to temporarily confine field-collected organisms in a non-injurious manner in order to gain information or support additional studies. This protocol represents a thoroughly tested, quick, and inexpensive field method for safely handling bees of conservation concern that can easily be tailored toward specific project needs, including organism identification, pollen removal, marking, and/or collection of non-lethal tissue samples for genetic analysis. This methodology can serve as an additional option in the researcher's toolbox to use when certain scenarios arise. It is anticipated that this methodology can be adapted for use with other insect species as well as used by individuals of varying experience and skill levels. It can be of great value to researchers studying specialist bees or conducting host-specific studies. The data collection made possible by this protocol will be invaluable to help researchers address critical data gaps for many pollinator species, plant-pollinator network structures, and pollinator conservation and management initiatives.

We demonstrate a tested method for safely handling field-collected bees. This method allows swift manipulation, identification, genetic sampling, and confirmation of plant-insect interactions via pollen collected while sampling. Easily adaptable, this approach offers a cost-effective, non-lethal means to study rare insect groups.

Sampling for Estimating Frankliniella Species Flower Thrips and Orius Species Predators in Field Experiments

Summary

Explore More Videos

Chapters in this video

Application of Two-spotted Spider Mite Tetranychus urticae for Plant-pest Interaction Studies

Administering and Detecting Protein Marks on Arthropods for Dispersal Research

Field Experiments of Pollination Ecology: The Case of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea

Methodology for Developing Life Tables for Sessile Insects in the Field Using the Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in Cotton As a Model System

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Topical Application Bioassay to Quantify Insecticide Toxicity for Mosquitoes and Fruit Flies

Sieving Fruit Pulp to Detect Immature Tephritid Fruit Flies in the Field

A Rapid Method to Confine and Safely Handle Bees in the Field