Method Article
Here, we present a protocol for procuring and preparing vascularized composite hand allografts during distal or proximal forearm transplantation.
Upper limb amputations represent a real medical and surgical challenge. The ideal treatment should restore function, sensation, and body image. At present, neither traditional reconstructions nor prostheses meet all these criteria. However, vascularized composite allografts offer a unique option for restoring form and function satisfactorily despite harmful immunosuppression.
Ideally, donor tissue is procured in excess to repair without tension. The donor upper limb is procured through a fish-mouth incision at the mid-arm level. Then, the brachial artery and vein, median, ulnar, and radial nerve are located and dissected. The biceps, brachioradialis, and triceps muscles are sectioned, and then an osteotomy of the humerus is performed above the elbow. For distal forearm transplantation, the donor upper limb can also be procured below the elbow by disarticulating through the joint.
The brachial artery is cannulated, and the graft is irrigated with a preservative solution. Preparation of the graft then begins with two incisions, anterior and posterior, to raise two lateral skin flaps. A medial skin flap exposes the basilic vein, medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, medial epicondylar muscles, ulnar nerve, median nerve, brachial artery, and vein. A lateral skin flap, including the cephalic vein, the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, the radial nerve up to its division, the brachioradialis, and the lateral epicondylar muscles, completes graft preparation. In the case of transplantation, cutting guides are attached to the posterior surface of the two forearm bones to perform the osteotomies.
This protocol presents a systematized procedure for procuring and preparing a vascularized forearm composite allograft to ensure optimal results and minimize tissue damage during procurement.
Since the first successful hand transplantation by Dubernard in 19981, the medical community has done a lot of research and has made progress on upper extremity vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA). The main advantage is that VCA provides a unique option to restore form and function compared to traditional prosthetics or reconstructions2,3. Hand VCA is one of the best examples of VCA, comprising many diverse tissues: skin, neurovascular, bone, cartilage, and muscle4. To this date, there have been more upper extremity transplants than any other kind of vascularized composite allotransplantation5. Since there are some publications in the literature about the procurement and the preparation of hand VCA6,7,8,9, we simplified the protocol and gathered the main steps of this procedure.
Upper extremity transplantation is a multiple-step complex reconstructive procedure where surgical rehearsals can decrease ischemia time and complications8,10,11,12. Also, upper extremity transplants should be procured before solid organ procurement, and the hand procurement team needs to be trained and efficient to ensure the solid organs are not jeopardized4,6,11,13. Hence, there is a need for a standardized protocol to reliably procure and prepare an upper extremity vascularized composite allotransplant. As Dr Robert Acland, forefather of modern-day microsurgery, said, "Preparation is the only shortcut you need in surgery."
This protocol details all the processes, from the positioning to the closure of the donor limb during an upper extremity VCA. It explains the steps to procure the graft above the elbow or in a second method through the elbow. The preparation of the procured limb is different according to the level of transplantation: proximal forearm or distal forearm. Both preparations are described in this protocol. This detailed procedure aims to standardize procuring and preparing a vascularized forearm composite allograft, which is of interest both for research and translational studies, as well as in clinical practice, given the increasing number of forearm transplants to ensure optimal results and minimize tissue damage.
The Anatomy Laboratory of the Faculty of Medicine of Nice, France, generously provided the specimens and material used for the study. The French National Ethics Committee approved this study (approval number 83.2024), which was conducted following the Helsinki Declaration.
1. Preoperative care
2. Donor upper limb procurement above the elbow (mid-humeral transection) (Figure 1)
Figure 1: Mid arm with nerves, artery, veins, and muscles transected. (1) Radial nerve, (2) Brachial artery and vein, (3) Median nerve, (4) Ulnar nerve, (5) Humerus diaphysis. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
3. Packaging of the graft
4. Management of the donor residual limb
5. Donor upper limb procurement through the elbow (elbow transection)
NOTE: Same preoperative care, with the tourniquet at mid-arm.
6. Preparation of the graft for proximal forearm transplantation (Figure 2 and Figure 3)
NOTE: Tag each structure with a rectangular piece of Esmarch bandage marked with indelible ink markers and secured with 2-0 silk sutures or sterilized titanium named tags.
Figure 2: Neurovascular structures at the proximal forearm. (1) Lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, (2) Cephalic vein, (3) Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, (4) Basilic vein, (5) Radial nerve with its branches for BR, ECRL, ECRB, deep motor branch and superficial sensitive branch in a red loop, (6) Brachial veins, (7) Brachial artery, (8) Median nerve, (9) Ulnar nerve with its branch for FCU, (10) Biceps brachialis. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Forearm muscle mass elevated. (1) Extensor mass, (2) Brachioradialis, (3) Flexor mass, (4) Radial nerve, (5) Brachial veins, (6) Brachial artery, (7) Median nerve, (8) Ulnar nerve. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
7. Preparation of the graft for distal forearm transplantation (Figure 4 and Figure 5)
NOTE: Tag each structure with a rectangular piece of Esmarch bandage marked with indelible ink markers and secured with 2-0 silk sutures or sterilized titanium named tags.
Figure 4: Extensor tendons dissected. (1) APL, (2) EPB, (3) ECRL and ECRB, (4) EPL, (5) EIP, (6) EDC, (7) EDM, (8) ECU. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Flexor tendons and neurovascular bundles dissected. (1) Radial sensory branch, (2) Cephalic vein, (3) Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, (4) Basilic vein, (5) Radial artery, (6) Anterior interosseous artery, (7) Median nerve, (8) Ulnar nerve with its dorsal sensitive branch, (9) Ulnar artery, (10) FCR, (11) FCU, (12) FPL, (13) FDS, (14) FDP. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
At the end of this protocol, the donor limb should be ready for transplantation on the receiving residual limb. The radius and ulna are sufficiently exposed for the osteosynthesis with a 3.5-mm locking compression plate14,15,16 or 2.7-mm volar locking distal radius and ulna plates in distal forearm transplant. The brachial or radial and ulnar arteries are dissected depending on the level, allowing arterial anastomosis. Deep and superficial veins are also isolated, and the first anastomosis should be on the dominant venous system17. Donor tendons are dissected long enough to be repaired with the Pulvertaft weave technique14 or single-weave, "Brown" side-to-side tenorrhaphy18,19. In proximal transplant, the flexor mass, mobile wad, and extensor mass are fixed to the recipient's epicondyles by trans-osseous sutures20 or boneanchor16. Nerves are dissected enough to allow tension-free repair11. Finally, the two skin flaps will interdigitate with the volar and dorsal flap of the recipient residual limb to accommodate post-operative edema, preventing constriction and scar contracture at the closure site21.
During the dissection of six grafts, we measured with a caliper the dimensions of all vessels and nerves eligible for anastomosis. For the proximal forearm level, we found the mean diameter as follows (mean ± SD): brachial artery 5.17 ± 0.85 mm, brachial vein 3.75 ± 0.95 mm, cephalic vein 2.67 ± 0.79 mm, basilic vein 2.25 ± 0.07 mm, radial nerve branch to brachioradialis 0.84 ± 0.25 mm, deep branch of radial nerve 2.5 ± 0.54 mm, the sensitive branch of radial nerve 2.34 ± 0.51 mm, median nerve 6 ± 0.82 mm, ulnar nerve 4.75 ± 0.50 mm, medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve 3 ± 0.82 mm, lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve 2.34 ± 0.48 mm.
Figure 6: Average diameters (in mm) of vessels and nerves of interest at the proximal forearm level (BR = brachioradialis, RN = radial nerve). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
For the distal forearm level, we found the mean diameter as follows (mean ± SD): radial artery 4 ± 0.41 mm, ulnar artery 4.25 ± 0.50 mm, cephalic vein 1.88 ± 0.25 mm, basilic vein 1.25 ± 0.50 mm, sensitive branch of radial nerve 2.08 ± 0.25 mm, median nerve 4.5 ± 0.58 mm, ulnar nerve 4 ± 0.82 mm.
Figure 7: Average diameters (in mm) of vessels and nerves of interest at the distal forearm level (RN = radial nerve). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
In 2022, a systematic review of the outcomes of hand allotransplantation by Wells et al.2 found the following results: With 96 patients receiving 148 hand transplantation, with at least 98 at the forearm or wrist level, the success rate of the transplant was 89.2%. For the functional results, the DASH scores significantly decreased (P < 0.001) after hand transplantation. The post-operative disability scores for distal transplants (median, 16; IQR, 31.8) were significantly lower than those of proximal transplants (median, 38.5; IQR, 36; P = 0.035).
In the literature, multiple cases reported of proximal and distal forearm transplantation show overall good clinical evolution of the patients. This protocol described the procurements above the elbow (mid-humeral transection) for proximal transplantation16 and through the elbow (elbow disarticulation) for distal transplantation22.
This protocol presents some critical steps. First, the skin flap incisions are marked. The goal is to properly match the flaps to ensure sufficient tissue to close over the bulky tendon anastomoses without skin surplus, which can lead to bulky skin adaptation. Furthermore, distal tip perfusion of the flaps should be ensured. To help in this surgical planning, three-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry and 3D-printed skin incision guides can be useful, as Hummelink et al.23 described. The radial nerve must be transected proximal to its branches for BR, ECRL, and ECRB for proximal transplantation. This allows targeted anastomosis at the branch level rather than one proximal trunk-level radial nerve anastomosis, permitting less axonal loss between sensory and motor fascicles. Also, the distance for reinnervation will be diminished21,24.
The repair of the radial nerve depends on the level of initial amputation. The anastomosis can be performed directly on the sensory radial branch and motor posterior interosseous radial branch14.
Another pitfall is during the preparation for a distal forearm transplant. The anterior interosseous artery must be carefully identified during the exposition of the distal radius and ulna because an anastomose is feasible. This allows the graft to rely on three main arteries instead of two1.
Two methods of procurement are described in the literature. The first is the approach of the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) team, where the preparation with detailed dissection of the structures is performed in situ on the donor before a tourniquet release (20 min for 2 h of dissection), allowing reperfusion. The second method is the University of Pennsylvania (Penn) "cut and run" approach. In this case, the procurement is very rapid. In 20 min, all preparation is done after transportation to the recipient hospital8. The main advantage of the MGH method is that it reduces the ischemia time for the entire case. During the procurement, the brachial artery and veins need to be dissected but not ligated until the end of the reperfusion period18. The main problem is the logistical aspect with the SOT teams who wait and the risk of compromising the viability of solid organs if the donor becomes unstable11. In comparison, the Penn method allows quick procurement and does not impede additional teams for organ recovery. However, the ischemia time begins at the tourniquet inflation25.
The two procurement levels described in this protocol are possible for proximal forearm transplantation. Either above the elbow at mid-humerus level6,14,19,21 or the elbow26. However, in the case of elbow disarticulation, some dissection steps need to be adjusted: the nerve dissection needs to be proximal to the motor branches of the main nerves. Furthermore, the flexor and extensor mass must be respected and elevated in a subperiosteal plan rather than transected as in a distal forearm transplant16,26. This modification allows the preservation of the entire musculotendinous functional units essential in proximal forearm transplantation.
Concerning the preparation of the graft, there are major differences depending on the level of transplantation. In distal transplantation, the anatomic disadvantage, compared to proximal transplantation, is that each flexor and extensor tendon is individually dissected and repaired. However, an early active range of motion can be safely initiated, and there's no delay due to the reinnervation of flexors/extensors, allowing good function early after the surgery4,14.
After transplantations at more proximal levels, the outcome is less consistent and appears later20,27. The main difference is the reinnervation from a greater distance of the intrinsic muscle. This distance causes a progressive inhibition of nerve regeneration and alters the function16,24,26.
This protocol presents some limitations as the research was done on cadavers and not on a deceased donor and is based on our Nice (France) experience. Also, the level of amputation may vary on the receiving residual limb, and the preparation of the transplant may be modified according to the protocol described here.
The authors have no disclosures.
The authors would like to thank the individuals who donated their bodies to facilitate the anatomical research.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
11.5” medium premium surgiclip II auto suture vessel clip applier | Covidien | ||
2-0 silk suture | N/A | N/A | |
Adson forceps | MPM | 106-2112A | |
Bipolar coagulation forceps | Olsen | 20-1320I | |
Custodiol HTK solution for limb perfusion | Essential Pharmaceuticals Inc. | off-label use | |
Cysto/Bladder irrigation set | Baxter Healthcare Corp. | 2C4040 | |
Disposable scalpel #15 | Sklar | ||
DLP 3 mm vessel cannula blunt tip | Medtronic Inc | https://www.medline.com/product/Medtronic-DLP-Vessel-Cannulae/Cannulas-Tubing/Z05-PF24250?question=vessel%20cannula | |
Fine needle cautery | Cormedica | ||
Forceps dilators | WPI | 15910 | |
IV stopcock | N/A | N/A | |
Micro scissors | WPI | 504492 | |
Monopolar diathermy | Medtronic Inc | Valleylab | |
Oscillating saw | GPC Medical | https://www.gpcmedical.com/1015/BTD1138/battery-operated-oscillating-saw.html | |
Saline solution 0,9% | GenDepot | S0600-101 | |
Sterile Esmarch bandage | N/A | N/A | |
Sterile indelible ink markers | N/A | N/A | |
Strabismus scissors | Surtex | 102-4109 | |
Surgical marking pen | Cardinal health | 212PR | |
Sutures Ethilon 4.0 | Ethicon | 1667G | |
Syringue 10 mL | Agilent | 9301-6474 | |
Three sterile procurement plastic bags, and three sterile zip ties | N/A | N/A | |
Tissue forceps | MPM | 106-0511 | |
Vessel loop | Deroyal | 30-711 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved